Clicked Gallery

What is a Liquidation Preference?

Highlighted from a real earnings story. Explained by Clicked.

Used in a sentence

The Daily Ledger · Markets

The term sheet arrived with a 1x liquidation preference on the new money, which meant the investors would be repaid in full out of any sale before the founders saw a cent.

The reader highlighted one word mid-article. Clicked explained the finance term “liquidation preference” in plain language:

Explained in three depths

Same facts, different vibe — Slang mode 😎

The Clicked way

●○○

Overview

A liquidation preference is a right attached to preferred shares. When the company is sold, the holders of those shares are paid a set amount out of the proceeds before ordinary shareholders receive anything, usually the money they invested. A non-participating holder takes that amount or their percentage share of the proceeds, whichever is larger. A participating holder takes that amount and then their percentage share of what remains as well. Either way the set amount comes out first, which is how Trados sold for $60 million in 2005 and its ordinary shareholders received nothing.
●○○

Overview

A liquidation preference decides the order of the payout queue when a startup is bought. The investors go to the front and collect a figure they agreed years earlier, normally what they put in, sometimes double that. Depending on the version they signed, they may then come back for their cut of the leftovers too. So the number in the press release tells you very little on its own. Get bought for $10 million when the investors are owed $12 million, and your share is zero. 😎

A quick take — often all you need.

●●○

Detail

A liquidation preference is a right attached to preferred shares. When the company is sold or wound up, the holders of those shares are paid a set amount out of the proceeds before ordinary shareholders receive anything. Investors ask for a preference because a young company can sell for less than they invested, and ordinary shares would only give them a percentage of a poor price. The set amount is usually the money they invested, sometimes a multiple of it, and unpaid dividends are added to it each year. Two versions of the preference exist. With a non-participating preference, the holder takes either the set amount or their percentage share of the proceeds, whichever is larger. With a participating preference, the holder takes the set amount first and then also their percentage share of whatever remains. In both versions the set amount comes out before anyone else is paid, so the smaller the sale, the larger the share of the proceeds the preference takes. One example of an extreme case is Trados, which sold for $60 million in 2005. A management bonus plan was paid first and took $7.8 million, leaving $52.2 million. By then the preference had grown to $57.9 million, more than the $52.2 million that was left, so the preferred holders took all of the $52.2 million and the ordinary holders received nothing. A preference is not a debt: nobody owes the money, and the preference applies only when the company is sold or wound up. The preference decides who is paid; drag-along rights decide whether you are made to sell at all, and in a listed company that job falls to a squeeze-out merger.
●●○

Detail

A liquidation preference is the line in the term sheet that puts the investors at the front of the payout queue when the company is sold. Before the founders or anybody with common stock gets a cent, the investors collect a figure written into the contract: normally what they put in, though some contracts make it two or three times that. That is the whole idea, and the rest is about how much more they can take. Say the contract sets a participating preference of $20 million for 30% of the shares, and the company sells for $50 million. They collect the $20 million, then 30% of the remaining $30 million, $29 million in total. Had the contract said non-participating, they would have collected the bigger of that $20 million or 30% of the sale, which is $15 million, so the $20 million and nothing more. That extra $9 million under the participating version came out of everybody standing behind them in the queue, which is where the founders and the staff with options are standing. The valuation makes the headline; the liquidation preference decides who actually walks away with cash. 😎

Want more? One click digs deeper.

●●●

Analogy

Two people open a florist. One puts in $80,000 for half the shop, and the other owns the other half and runs the shop every day. The agreement gives the investor a participating liquidation preference of $80,000, the amount put in. The shop sells for $94,000. The investor takes the $80,000 first and then half of the $14,000 that remains, $87,000 in all, and the working partner keeps $7,000. Had the preference been non-participating, the investor would have taken only the larger of the $80,000 or half the price, so $80,000, and the working partner would have kept $14,000. Same shop, same buyer, and one word in the agreement halves what the person who ran the place takes home.
●●●

Analogy

Your brother backs your fashion store with $15,000 for a 50% stake, and the contract sets his liquidation preference at $15,000, participating. Some contracts set the preference at double or triple the money in, but his is $15,000. Four years later you sell the store for $20,000. He collects the $15,000 up front, then 50% of the remaining $5,000 on top: $17,500 for the brother who wrote one cheque, $2,500 for you. Had his contract said non-participating, he would have got only the bigger of his $15,000 or 50% of the sale, which is $10,000, so the $15,000, and you would have walked away with $5,000. 😎

Unfamiliar concept? A real-world example makes it click — fresh analogies on tap.

AI explanations may contain errors · Not professional advice

Formal definition — The same term, explained the usual way

A liquidation preference is a contractual right attached to a class or series of preferred stock, set out in the corporation's constitutional documents, entitling its holders to receive a specified amount from the proceeds of a liquidation, dissolution or deemed liquidation event, which customarily includes a sale or merger, before any distribution is made to holders of common stock. The preference is typically expressed as a multiple of the original subscription price, most commonly one times, and may accrue unpaid cumulative dividends, which increase the amount payable. A non-participating preference entitles the holder to the greater of the preference or the amount receivable on conversion to common stock; a participating preference entitles the holder to the preference and a further share of the remaining proceeds. Where multiple series exist, their relative ranking is a matter of negotiation. In In re Trados Inc. Shareholder Litigation (Del. Ch. 2013), a sale at $60 million against a preference of $57.9 million left the common stockholders with no proceeds, and the Court of Chancery appraised their shares at zero.

Want Clicked to explain terms like “liquidation preference” directly in your browser — including on PDFs?

Add to Chrome — Free

50 free Explanations · No credit card required